medicaid

Will the Nursing Home or County Take My House?

As an attorney practicing in elder law one of the most common questions I get is this: If I or my spouse need nursing home care, will the nursing home take our house? Or, similarly, if I or my spouse need assisted living care or memory care, will the county or state take our house? This is understandably a scary thought. Everyone’s home feels special and sacred, full of memories, and the result of a lifetime of working and saving to make your home just right or to finally get the mortgage paid in full.

So, will they take your home if you need long term care? The simple answer is: No. They can’t “take” your home. But could your home be subjected to a lien in the future? Yes, it could.

To begin with, no skilled nursing facility, assisted living facility, memory care facility, or other long-term care provider has the power to “take” your home or put a lien on it. Only the government has the power to do that. When you or your spouse needs care, you pay the care provider until you are able to qualify for Medical Assistance, and then Medical Assistance pays the care provider on your behalf. Medical Assistance is a state-run program administered at the county level. The county keeps a tab on how much money is expended by them on your behalf for Medical Assistance benefits. Ultimately, it is the county that has the power to attach a lien to your home to collect the value of the benefits paid on your behalf or on behalf of your spouse.

When you apply for Medical Assistance, the house you or your spouse lives in is treated as an excluded asset, which means that it is not counted toward your asset limit and you can keep the house as long as you or your spouse continues to reside there. But when you both die, the county will have a claim against the estate of the surviving spouse to collect the value of Medical Assistance benefits paid on behalf of either spouse. In other words, the county cannot collect any money from you or your estate or put a lien on your house until after you and your spouse are deceased.

So, where does this idea come from that the county or nursing home can take your house? Well, there are a couple of instances where this can become an issue. First, consider what happens when a single person goes into a nursing home or where both spouses go into a nursing home. Can they still protect the house? The answer is: No. They have a six-month grace period and then the house has to be put up for sale. Does the county take the proceeds from the sale of the house? No. Again, as long as the Medical Assistance recipient or their spouse is still living, the county cannot take anything. But the proceeds from the house sale will have to be spent on nursing home care, which may be why many people think the nursing home “takes” the house. If neither spouse is capable of residing in the home, the home generally has to be sold and the proceeds spent on care.

Second, a lot of people try to leave the home to their children when they die. But when a single person or the surviving spouse dies, the county can put a lien on the house to collect the balance of Medical Assistance benefits paid on behalf of the deceased person or their spouse. In most cases, the children who inherit the house will have to pay off this lien before they can transfer the title to the house into their names. And in most cases, this means selling the house to pay off the lien. Again, the county doesn’t “take” the house, but they force a sale of the house to collect the Medical Assistance estate recovery claim.

Are there ways to protect the home from having to be sold to either pay for care or pay a Medical Assistance estate recovery claim at death? Yes, there are! And you should talk to an experienced elder law attorney for advice on how to protect your home as soon as you anticipate the need for long term care.

Call for a free 15-minute consultation today!

Print Friendly and PDF

Elder Law Basics Series: Medicaid Eligibility

In a prior post in the Elder Law Basics post, I explained the difference between Medicaid and Medicare. For elder law purposes, the main distinction is that Medicaid pays for long term care services whereas Medicare provides traditional health insurance and only pays for short-term nursing home stays. In this post, I’m going to address what makes a person eligible for Medicaid, or as we call it in Minnesota, “Medical Assistance.”

First, it’s important to understand that there is a distinction between income-based Medical Assistance (MA) for low-income adults and MA for long term care (MA-LTC). Qualifying low-income adults and children may receive health insurance benefits through MA and there is no asset limit to qualify. But if you have a disability and need a nursing facility level of care either in a skilled nursing facility, assisted living facility, or at home, then income-based MA will not cover what you need. In that case, you need MA-LTC or what is referred to as a “waiver program.”

MA-LTC covers long term care services, which are skilled nursing services offered in a traditional nursing home setting. “Waiver programs” cover the same services, but in a community-based setting, such as assisted living facilities, memory care facilities, or at home. There are several different waiver programs offered in Minnesota for various needs, including the Community Access for Disability Inclusion (CADI) waiver for persons with disabilities under age 65 and the Elderly Waiver (EW) for disabled persons 65 and up. The financial eligibility rules for MA-LTC and all waiver programs are substantially the same even though each program is designed for people with different needs.

For MA-LTC and all waiver programs, there is an asset limit for both the person receiving benefits and their spouse, if they are married. For the person receiving benefits, the asset limit is $3,000. This figure has not changed in many years, and seems unlikely to change soon. For the person’s spouse, they are limited to $126,420, but unlike the MA recipient’s asset limit, the spousal asset limit is adjusted annually for inflation. Certain assets do not count toward either spouse’s asset limit, including their primary residence, one vehicle, and personal belongings (like clothing, electronics, furniture, etc.). All other property, however, does count toward the asset limit, including retirement accounts (IRAs, 401(k)s), most trust accounts, and all other real estate (farmland, cabins, etc.).

In addition, the MA recipient’s income is calculated and contributed toward the cost of their care, with certain limited exceptions, such as a personal needs allowance ($102 per month), and in some cases additional income may be given to the spouse to cover excess housing costs. The income calculation for waiver programs can be quite complicated, and some people may not qualify for a waiver program if their income exceeds their care costs. But the spouse of an MA recipient is not required to contribute their income for the MA recipient’s care, in other words, there is no “spousal income deeming” for MA. This makes possible certain asset protection strategies such as planning with Medicaid-compliant annuities.

In addition to the basic financial eligibility requirements, the MA applicant must meet additional criteria based on their needs. For example, they must require a nursing home level of care, which means they typically must be evaluated by a public health nurse as part of what is called the MNChoices Assessment. And for MA-LTC or MA-EW, they must be 65 and older; or, for CADI they must be under 65.

These are just the most basic elements of eligibility and because every person’s situation is different, even though you or your loved one may meet these basic criteria, there may be other considerations before you or your loved one should apply. For example, you may be ineligible for benefits if the applicant or their spouse gifted assets within the last five years. There are also special asset limit rules for families that own small businesses or farms. If you are looking for more information about qualifying for MA, please contact me to discuss your situation.

Print Friendly and PDF

Elder Law Basics Series: Medicare vs. Medicaid

This post is the first in a series that I’m calling “Elder Law Basics.” The idea is to give a brief introduction to the essential elements of a law practice focused on serving the needs of the elders in our community, and to help readers understand what is meant by the term “elder law.” Elder law encompasses many things because the practice is focused on a population not on a distinct set of laws. But because the practice spans so many disciplines that we usually think of as separate — like estate planning and landlord-tenant and healthcare — it can be confusing to understand what an elder law attorney actually “does.” (By the way, “agriculture law” suffers from the same form of confusion. It too is interdisciplinary in scope and focuses on a population — farmers — rather than a particular legal discipline. What can I say, I like to wear a lot of different hats!)

I’d like to start out this first post by focusing on a health-law aspect of my elder law practice, and a topic that generates a lot of confusion and misinformation in the broader community. I’m talking about Medicare and Medicaid.

A lot of people confuse Medicare and Medicaid, but they are two separate healthcare insurance programs that originate with the federal government and involve some administration at the state level as well. Medicare is a health insurance program primarily for people over 65, although people who are permanently disabled or have certain diseases may also qualify for insurance coverage through Medicare. Medicare has four parts: Part A, which is known as “hospital insurance,” Part B, which is known as the “health insurance” part and covers some preventive care; Part C, which is “Medicare Advantage,” a sort of hybrid of Parts A and B; and finally, Part D, which is prescription coverage. Medicaid is also a health insurance program, but it pays for healthcare when a person can no longer afford to do so. A person may qualify for Medicaid if their income is too low, or if they’re over 65 or disabled and require long term care but cannot afford to pay for it. There are income and asset limits to qualify for Medicaid, and I’ll discuss those in a later post.

For now, I want to highlight some things about Medicare that most people aren’t aware of. First, you might not know that if you’re 65 and receiving Social Security, you’ll be automatically enrolled in Medicare Parts A & B. But what about people who are still working at 65? Do they need to enroll? The answer is that it depends. If you’re actively working and receiving health insurance through your employer (or your spouse’s employer), and if the company has more than 20 employees, you do not need to enroll in Medicare. But, if the employer has fewer than 20 employees, Medicare will still be considered the primary payer, and you should enroll to avoid a penalty. If you’re 65 and not collecting Social Security yet, it’s a good idea to talk with a professional about whether you should be enrolling or not so that you don’t lose coverage or have to pay a penalty.

In addition, Medicare Part A pays for hospital stays (up to 150 days), and skilled nursing facility stays that follow at least a 3-day inpatient hospital stay (up to 100 days). When it comes to skilled nursing care, many people are told by their healthcare provider that Medicare will stop paying for skilled nursing care if the patient does not show improvement. That is not true. According to a recent settlement agreement with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, there is no legal requirement that a patient demonstrate improvement for Medicare to continuing paying for care. Medicare must continue to pay for care so long as it is medically necessary for up to a maximum of 100 days.

Many people also need home health care due to age-related illnesses or after a hospital stay. Many people and care providers don’t realize, however, that Medicare Part A also pays for in-home care. So long as the care is ordered by a physician and the patient is “homebound,” which simply means they need assistance with moving (for example, a cane, walker, or wheelchair), Medicare will pay for up to 28 to 35 hours of in-home care per week, and there is no limit on how long the person can continue receiving care at home.

One big issue that has come up in Medicare cases over the years is something called “observational status.” In order to qualify for Part A coverage for a hospital stay or for skilled nursing care following a hospital stay, the patient must be considered in in-patient (not out-patient) care. Many hospitals are categorizing patients as out-patient by putting them on “observational status.” Hospitals may be afraid that they will lose money on Medicare patients, so they avoid this by making the patient’s hospital stay not qualify for Medicare coverage. Since most patients have no way of knowing whether they’ve been admitted as in-patient or whether they are on observational status, all patients are entitled to a “Medicare Outpatient Observation Notice” (MOON) within 36 hours of hospitalization. Patients on observational status can and should dispute their status with their care provider.

If you or a loved one have questions about Medicare or Medicaid, feel free to give me a call or contact my firm for more information.

Print Friendly and PDF

Medicaid Estate Recovery in the News

Until recently, Minnesota was one of the states that recovered not just long-term care services but all Medicaid services provided to persons 55 and older.  But no one really noticed.  Why?  Because until 2014, to be eligible for recoverable Medicaid services you had to meet strict asset eligibility rules.  For instance, for a person to qualify for long-term care services, you cannot have more than $3,000 in available assets.  For these folks, estate recovery didn’t seem so bad because there wasn’t much to recover at the end of that person’s life.  But in 2014, Minnesota participated in the Medicaid expansion under the ACA (“Obamacare”).  This expansion lifted the asset limitation for folks under 65, greatly expanding the number of people who qualified for insurance paid for through Medicaid.  Suddenly, many more people were enrolled in a program for which estate recovery rules applied.

Print Friendly and PDF